Ask The Brewmasters

 View Only
  • 1.  PAA vs Iodophor for SIP

    Posted 09-11-2024 13:06

    I want to get opinions on what everyone is using for FV and BBT sanitation. We have used Iodophor for many years but am considering switching to PAA (specifically BioSide HS 15%) for multiple reasons. From my research, it seems to be more effective against common micro organisms found in a brewery setting and works better against food born pathogens. I know there was a study that came out in 2017 on the efficacy of sanitizers in brewery from Bell's Brewing and, at a "no-rinse" level of 25ppm, iodophor was not very effective. Any insight will help. Thanks.



    ------------------------------
    Andrew Sanderson
    Quality Manager
    Sly Fox Brewing Co
    Pottstown PA
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: PAA vs Iodophor for SIP

    Posted 09-12-2024 14:34

    We switched from Chlorine Dioxide to PAA at my last brewery and didn't notice any changes with regard to micro growth or quality. We were using San-O2-Gard, but I don't imagine you will see much difference if you are hitting the right concentration. I'll note that we were pasteurizing all packaged product but never had an infection prior to packaging that I can remember. If you are worried about it, you may be able to get a sample or enough to run some tests from your supplier Eco-Labs used to do this for us every now and then. That way you can run a few trials on different tanks and after different products, check your micro clearance and ATPs to make sure it meets your needs. 



    ------------------------------
    Sean Flynn, Diploma Brewer
    Solutions Beverage Consulting
    Missoula MT
    (303) 521-9674
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: PAA vs Iodophor for SIP

    Posted 09-13-2024 15:00

    Pete Milfred from AceChem and Brew City Solutions here - San-O2-Gard is PAA/Perasan A from Enviro Tech (same manufacturer as Bioside HS 15% and Reflex) and the majority of breweries we work with use PAA as their primary sanitizer. In terms of effectiveness, WSU released a paper in 2019 describing the effectiveness of Cl02/chlorine dioxide and quats in comparison to PAA and long story short, their testing results led to a conclusion that "PAA at 160–200 ppm showed a larger net log reduction compared to other sanitizers tested" (as seen on page 8):

     

    https://envirotech.com/wp-content/uploads/_pda/2015/12/WSU-PAA-Comparison-Study.pdf

     

    Bottom line, PAA is a great sanitizer and is perfect for CIP, which is why so many breweries now use it as their primary sanitizer for brewing vessels.

    Sent from my iPhone





  • 4.  RE: PAA vs Iodophor for SIP

    Posted 09-13-2024 10:23

    We've been using Reflex which I believe is a PA and Nitric blend which combines the acid wash step and sanitize steps, is no rinse and doesn't react in CO2 rich environments (so you can sanitize Brites under pressure to save CO2). I love it.



    ------------------------------
    Jeff Lukasik
    Owner/Brewer
    Nostrovia Brewing Co
    Erie PA
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: PAA vs Iodophor for SIP

    Posted 09-13-2024 14:58

    We also use this and love it because we have reduced our phos nitric blend acid wash from once every 3 turns to once every 6 on our tanks.



    ------------------------------
    Ivan Dedek
    Director of Brewing Operations
    Meier's Creek Brewing
    Cazenovia NY
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: PAA vs Iodophor for SIP

    Posted 09-13-2024 18:44

    Hi Andrew:

    Peracetic Acid and Iodophor have about the same efficacy when it comes to beer spoilers.  Iodophors are more stable which is why many brewers used to use them for soaking parts in sanitizer after cleaning.  However, Iodine is much more corrosive on stainless steel than Peracetic Acid, especially when left unrinsed.  Halogen corrosion is common and back in the 90's, when most breweries still used Iodophors for sanitizing tanks, I came across a lot of headspace corrosion in tanks as well as overall halogen pitting.  As a general rule, I do not recommend using any sanitizer without a final rinse (just because you can does not mean you should) since stainless steel damage is almost guaranteed, even with Peracetic Acid.  However, should you choose to use your sanitizer without a final rinse, Peracetic Acid will break down into compounds naturally present in beer, namely acetate, water, and atomic oxygen.  It is important to note that the oxygen from the Peracetic Acid is the radical O-, not O2.  Therefore, you will not see an increase in TDO in your beer or long-term oxidation.  Instead, instantaneous oxidation takes place if you leave large amounts of PAA in your vessels and then fill them with beer.  You will be able to pick up this oxidation in a beer tasting panel within days.  Iodophors also have a devastating effect on head retention and can, in extreme cases, cause a medicinal off-flavor in beer.

    I have not read the study from Bell's Brewing, but I assure you that fresh Iodophor at 25ppm is highly effective against beer spoiling organisms. I am saying fresh since Iodine like most halogens loses its efficacy over time.

    In summary, I do not recommend using Iodophor for sanitizing tanks and other equipment since the halogen can easily cause halogen corrosion and pitting on 300 series stainless steel, especially if left unrinsed or overdosed.  Peracetic Acid is overall less corrosive and just as effective, less expensive, and does not cause negative effects in beer.

    I hope this helps.

    Cheers,      

               

       



    ------------------------------
    Dirk Loeffler
    SEKA Chemicals
    (404) 239-2700
    loeffler.dirk@sekachemicals.com
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: PAA vs Iodophor for SIP

    Posted 09-18-2024 14:47

    I agree with Dirks comments. I have used PAA successfully for many years - sometimes without rinsing - but the tank should be completely drained before filling. It is safer to rinse the tank of PAA residues as long as you are sure that the rinse water is microbiologically sound.

    I may have misunderstood some of other comments on this subject. PA usually refers to Phosphoric acid. Nitro phosphoric blends are not sanitizers. They are excellent de-scalers and very suitable for cleaning vessels with low soil levels such as BBTs. If residues are left in the vessel the components will not break down like PAA. Therefore nitro-phosphoric acid should always be rinsed from tanks prior to filling with beer.

    Finally, the effect of sanitizers will only be of benefit for that particular CIP. There will not be a residual sanitizing effect for the next few cleans. It's false economy - if you develop an infection and have to recall some of the beer then all savings from cutting back on the sanitizer stage will be very quickly lost. 



    ------------------------------
    Richard Rench
    Oakville ON
    ------------------------------