Ask The Brewmasters

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

  • 1.  CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 10-30-2023 14:46

    We've been using a multi sensor CO2 monitoring system in our facility.  We currently have them set up to have a blinking strobe light go off when a sensor reads over 5000 ppm.  It doesn't take much to set off a sensor depending on what process is going on since they are installed near the ground.  I'm concerned that if the strobe lights are constantly blinking they will start to be ignored.  Does anyone have any guidance on what levels these monitors should be set to alarm?  I found a resource on MBAA that had low level alarm set at 1.5% (15000 ppm) and high level alarm at 3.0% (30000 ppm).  The source was listed as CO2meter.com (maybe not the most reliable source).  The only trustworthy guidance I can find is that the OSHA allowable limit is 5000 ppm average over the course of an 8 hour shift.  I'm interested in increasing the limits so that they are only going off when there is a real concern, but want to make sure it's backed by sound science with safety in mind.  I'm curious what others are doing in their facilities.



    ------------------------------
    Jason Weihbrecht
    GM of Brewery Operations
    Oskar Blues Brewery
    Brevard NC
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 10-31-2023 14:29
    Hi Jason, 

    We have a similar system and have our low/high alerts set up at 5000 ppm/15000 ppm. Rather than changing those limits, I'd suggest looking into ways to improve ventilation in the facility to reduce those levels, so that an employee can safely work in the area for an 8-hour shift without being exposed to CO2 levels above the OSHA limit. We use several big fans that move a lot of air to keep things circulating and open our rollup doors during production to allow fresh air ingress. We also use a handheld meter periodically to check on areas that don't have a sensor in the immediate area. Your local fire inspector might also have some guidance on where your limits should be set. 

    Cheers, 

    Eric


                       

    Eric Greene

    Dragoon Brewing Company
    1859 W Grant Rd #111
    Tucson, AZ 85745

    www.dragoonbrewing.com | eric@dragoonbrewing.com
    520.329.3606 office | 520.229.7904 cell





  • 3.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 10-31-2023 14:31

    Hi Jason,

    Congratulations on having a CO2 monitoring system.

    May I offer a different perspective? You state you are interested in increasing the alarm set-point to reduce the frequency of alarms, when you might rather be concerned with reducing the excessive levels of CO2 that are setting off alarms. 

    Alarm set-points below the permissible exposure limit (PEL) give the employer a chance to act before employees are exposed above legal limits. An example is an alarm set-point of 20% of the explosive concentration of methane in air. You need to rectify the atmosphere or evacuate immediately to avoid being blown up, assuming the methane continues to accumulate.

    Alarm set points above the PEL are often used when the results of overexposure aren't as catastrophic as blowing up the workplace. With CO2, the thinking is that a worker could go over the all day average PEL of 5000 ppm for short periods, as long as the 8-hr time-weighted average (TWA), remains below 5000 ppm. But when an alarm sounds above 15000 or 30000 ppm, 1) what is the real concentration in the room? (A: we don't know unless we look at the display), 2) will this result in exceeding the 8-hr average? (A: we don't know unless we have integrated every measurement taken across those 8 hours), and 3) do I need to evacuate? (A: probably, if you're over 30000pm). Somewhere around 40000 ppm a worker may become impaired fast enough to interfere with self-evacuation. This value is called the IDLH (immediately detrimental to life or health). A trick for remembering IDLH is "I don't like it here!" Even so, all human bodies perform differently under exposure scenarios, so I prefer to be suspicious of the real protection afforded by the PEL or the IDLH.

    Back to my original point, the primary good thing about an alarm going is off is it is telling you your process containment and exposure controls are inadequate. Don't fight the alarm, use it as a process control. An example: if the pressure gauge on a BBT rated for 15 psi was showing 40 psi, do you ask how to put more pressure into it or do you take immediate action to reduce pressure? 

    CO2 controls can be whatever means you invent to keep the CO2 levels in check, as long as they don't make the problem worse for others. Some examples I've seen include:

    • large shop fans (sometimes automated with CO2 monitoring systems)
    • opening up your more enclosed spaces during FV blowdown or turnover to promote dilution, could be as simple as opening windows or a dock door
    • hard piping CO2 exhaust to a safe outside area
    • implementing CO2 capture system
    • substituting nitrogen where feasible
    • optimizing CO2 levels in filling and lidding, and so on. 

    OSHA does not say CO2 has to be managed a certain way. It says workers cannot be exposed above a workday average. To win the game, do what it takes to identify sources of fugitive CO2 and manage its release to avoid overexposure. 

    Cheers!



    ------------------------------
    Matt Stinchfield
    Author "Brewery Safety: Principles, Processes and People"
    BA Safety Subcommittee
    Safety Coach
    Guilford, VT
    802-258-8748
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 10-31-2023 16:48
      |   view attached

    Thanks for the responses.  We do have several industrial fans positioned through the facility to keep air moving with a few installed in the exterior wall to keep steady air flowing.  We have additional air movers available to help move CO2 in any problem areas when an alarm does go off.  We're really doing as much as we can to keep fresh air moving through the facility.  I think the next logical step is to look at engineering fixes to vent tanks directly outside and things like that. 

    I uploaded the specific information that is posted in the MBAA safety section that lists low level alarm at 15000 and high level alarm at 30000.  Perhaps that information should be changed if it's not accurate.  I'd like to follow what is accepted as best practices and was curious what levels others are using for their monitoring systems.



    ------------------------------
    Jason Weihbrecht
    GM of Brewery Operations
    Oskar Blues Brewery
    Brevard NC
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 11-01-2023 16:59

    If you're looking at engineering an outside venting system, and at your size, the cost of COcapture has really come down, especially with what Earthly Labs has been doing.  I was looking into it at a brewery in Alaska, and the ROI was pretty quick at just 1,500 bbl/yr.  If you haven't looked into that lately, I'd give it look.



    ------------------------------
    Adam Keele
    Founder/Brewer
    Eureka Moment Brewing Co.
    Eureka CA
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 11-01-2023 16:59
      |   view attached
    We vent our tanks to the outside through a long 2" braided hose with a hosebarb connection to the bottom of the tank, after an initial rinse under pressure.

    This flip open hatch on our roll-up door ("engineering control") lets us do that without letting in too many bugs and not much cold, rain and snow.



    --
    Alex Kopf
    Lead Brewer
    N[orthwoods Brewing Company





  • 7.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 11-02-2023 21:51
    Jason:
    Please refer to my portion of the  MBAA/ BA/ ASBC Critical CO2 Presentation series which included health effects of CO2 , ventilation, and monitoring details. Or ask offline and I will share it.

    NASA previously allowed a max of 5000 ppm CO2 in space craft but are revising that after seeing the physical and psychological effects on astronauts.
    Other studies found calcification of liver and acidification of blood result at lower concentrations than the accepted healthy 5000 ppm. Poor brain function in classrooms is well documented  from 600 to 1000 ppm. It shouldn't be surprising that a restricted availability of oxygen to the human organism would be problematic. But how it affects human health wasn't considered a problem worth researching. It's only an asphyxiant, right?

    The increased global use of CO2 in greenhouse growing processes has initiated new studies of worker health in those businesses and I can't wait til results are published. 

    I hope the new studies prove the results of previous studies are wrong. If not, the new results will drive us to make changes sooner. With asbestos and silica we overlooked the reality until older workers were overcome by health problems from those materials.

    Thanks,
     
            Tony
     
    RUSSELL McCRIMMON, O.H.S.T.
    @brewery.safety.consulting
    BA Safety Subcommittee





  • 8.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 10-31-2023 16:44

    CO2 has an 8 hour TLV of 5000 ppm. Its ceiling concentration is 30000 ppm. ILDH (immediately dangerous to life and health) is 40000 ppm. If you are exceeding 5000 ppm regularly, you should institute continuous monitoring and recording. 



    ------------------------------
    Roger Barth
    Author (with M Farber) of Mastering Brewing Science ISBN 9781119456056
    Retired
    West Chester PA
    ------------------------------



  • 9.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 11-01-2023 10:22
    We have CO2 monitors set at about chest level; where you would be breathing the air. When levels go above 1100 they start to flash. The flashing intensifies up to 5000 ppm. If we notice it above 1500, we will turn on floor fans to direct the CO2 to the ventilation system. Levels above 1500 are definitely noticeable and not good for you, and your interstaff relationships over time. Headaches and short tempers are the initial symptoms. Measuring levels at the floor level really doesn't tell you much regarding personal exposure.

    --
    Alex Kopf
    Lead Brewer
    Northwoods Brewing Company





  • 10.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 11-01-2023 11:45

    That was my thought too.  The installation instructions were to install the sensors 12" off of the ground, which is what we did.  So it is obviously going to represent the very worst scenario and not be representative of what people would actually be exposed to while standing and working.



    ------------------------------
    Jason Weihbrecht
    GM of Brewery Operations
    Oskar Blues Brewery
    Brevard NC
    ------------------------------



  • 11.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 11-02-2023 15:31

    It needs to be stated while it makes sense to have monitors near the head region for most people (thinking for your shortest people), as I understand and logically surmise for full-scope safety measures,  you want to know the greatest concentration near the floor in case you go down for any reason--whether it be from CO2 or any other reason (e.g. trip and knock yourself unconscious, a medical condition, prolonged time doing something at the bottom of a tank like maintenance, etc.) so you don't die from something that you wouldn't have except for the fact there is too high of a concentration of CO2.  So what might just make you dizzy standing upright and might allow you to get out of the situation, but if you end up on the ground for whatever reason, you might be done for.  How safer than sorry do you want to be?

    At one brewery I worked for, the city made us put in automatic fans and louvers tied into our CO2 monitoring system due to the potential output from our 100 bbl tanks.  Only once did I ever see an alarm go off, but periodically saw the louvers open and fan turn on.  So as long as no governing body based on your location says others, you might be able to not have alarms until it gets to more critical levels after a certain time.  I don't remember if our louvers were set to up first at a certain level, and if the too much time elapsed without dropping below a certain set point, the fans would kick on, but I like that idea.  That same brewery when they opened, the plan was to get to 10,000 bbl as soon as possible and started with only one brewer.  One day while manually dry hopping a 100 on a ladder towards the end of fermentation, he passed out on the ladder over the tank.  Luckily it wasn't for long and he didn't fall the 25 or so feet.  After that dry hopping became a two-person task. Even with a good monitoring and venting system, it failed in this situation.



    ------------------------------
    Adam Keele
    Founder/Brewer
    Eureka Moment Brewing Co.
    Eureka CA
    ------------------------------



  • 12.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 11-02-2023 19:49

    Doing things at the bottom of tanks is a special situation requiring extraordinary safeguards. OSHA has a detailed set of regulations regarding work in confined spaces. Every brewery, large and small is subject to these regulations. Here is a link: 1910.146 - Permit-required confined spaces | Occupational Safety and Health Administration (osha.gov)

    On average there are 130 confined spaces fatalities a year in the US. One such incident occurred in the Grupo Modelo Brewery in Mexico City in 2013. It is reported that seven men died. 



    ------------------------------
    Roger Barth
    Author (with M Farber) of Mastering Brewing Science ISBN 9781119456056
    Retired
    West Chester PA
    ------------------------------



  • 13.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 11-01-2023 17:00

    Hi Jason,

     

    First I totally echo Matt Stinchfield's comments regarding CO2 exposure and safety. CO2 asphyxiation has killed brewers in the past when tank entry was normal but is still a hazard. And it isn't just CO2, nitrogen can also pose the same danger. A winery worker in Oregon died a couple of years ago entering a tank that had been emptied with a nitrogen top pressure and not adequately ventilated.

     

    I experienced CO2 poisoning a number of years ago when I worked as a supervisor at the AB Newark brewery. I was at the and of a cellar hall where two 1,100 bbl chip tanks (lager tanks) were being vented out with large blowers stuck in their manways directly across the aisle from each other. The result was that the large volume of CO2 from the tanks was simply being pushed out and flooding the hallway, with nowhere to go. There were no CO2 alarm meters. I quickly felt dull-lightheadedness, gasping for breath, headache, stars popping around me and then a feeling of losing consciousness. Indeed if a colleague had not happened through and seen me stumbling and got me out, I might have collapsed and asphyxiated. I say this to emphasize that CO2 exposure can be at least a hazardous nuisance but can also be lethal without tank entry.

     

    The best and easiest mitigation to keep CO2 levels down in the brewery is to intercept and vent the biggest offenders. These are active fermentations, BB and serving tank purges and tank blowdowns.  You can vent all active fermentations, preferably through a foam trap, and any tank purges and blow downs out of the building through a simple pipe. But please leave those CO2 meters on and at the factory alarm settings.

     

    Cheers,

     

    Karl

     

    Consulting Brewer

    Karl Ockert Brewing Services LLC

    www.ockertbrewserv.com

    Cell:  503-887-1938

     






  • 14.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 11-01-2023 21:55

    Carbon dioxide is a toxic gas, not an asphyxiant. It does not act primarily by displacement of oxygen. A dangerous level of CO2 is well below what it would take to push the oxygen below safe levels.

    We are all very glad that you survived this incident and went on to edit the MBAA Practical Handbook.



    ------------------------------
    Roger Barth
    Author (with M Farber) of Mastering Brewing Science ISBN 9781119456056
    Retired
    West Chester PA
    ------------------------------



  • 15.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 11-02-2023 15:30

    Thanks Roger, happy to be here too. OSHA considers carbon dioxide to be a toxic asphyxiant gas. The CO2 poisoning effects, ie headache, dullness and rapid breathing, are very unpleasant but it is the displacement of oxygen by the heavier CO2 that can lead to suffocation and death. That's why the OSHA confined space regulations center on testing, with a calibrated oxygen meter, for at least 19.5% O2 in the atmosphere to be entered (29 CFR 1910.146). These meters usually measure oxygen, hydrogen sulfide, carbon monoxide and combustible gases per the regulation. Indeed one of my duties at the AB brewery was to use an O2 meter with a long wand to test the long horizontal chip tanks, which had to be opened up and have a powerful blower inserted for at least 90 minutes, to ensure a minimum 19.5% O2 reading prior to entry by the brewers to remove the beechwood chips. We did not measure CO2 because it was not required although sometimes the brewers would complain if the back of the tank was still gassy.

     

    While tank entry is pretty rare in most craft breweries, it is still practiced in larger, older breweries. In most craft breweries CIP has relieved the need to enter cellar tanks, except for inspection or repairs. Confined space entry procedures are very serious and important. But the effect of a gassy environment in the brewery work areas, and subsequent CO2 poisoning, will cause symptoms for workers of foggy thinking, headaches, etc. that are uncomfortable and unhealthy.

     

    I think we can all agree that its important for breweries to be well ventilated and avoid buildups of CO2 which can be detected with CO2 sensors/alarms.

     

    Cheers,

     

    Karl

     

    Consulting Brewer

    Karl Ockert Brewing Services LLC

    www.ockertbrewserv.com

    Cell:  503-887-1938

     






  • 16.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 11-01-2023 19:49
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    There have been several great answers and advice given to the original posting.  I'd like to add a few suggestions

    1. Try to install your CO2 monitor (hopefully a red, yellow, green type) near your entrance to your fermenting cellar area. This way you'll see an alarm condition as you enter the area. Post signage outside cellar door to warn others of possible CO2 danger.
    2. If the monitor is red, back out and follow your Safety reaction plan ( create one if you don't have one)
    3. If red, you must put on an air pack before entering the area to locate a leak, or set up exhausting. Don't do this alone, have a second person standing watch. Don't try to hold your breath and attempt a fix.
    4. When your monitor clears proceed again as normal.
    5. In one of the answers it talks about TEL for CO2 over 8 hr shift. From a Safety vendor obtain some CO2 Draeger tubes to hang on the employee for 8 hrs. Read results at end of shift, the tube turns purple as it picks up CO2. This will help keep your employees safe.
    6. If high readings, check piping, hoses, fittings for leaks. This can be done simply with a soapy solution or get a sound device to hear leaks.



  • 17.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 11-02-2023 06:41

    Jason, I read your initial question as an 'Alarm Function' Concern more than a 'Safe Level' Concern. To Matt's point, having a low-level alarm of 15,000-ppm gives plenty of time to mitigate the issue before it reaches its full hazard potential. Whereas a low-level alarm of 5,000-ppm may initiate monitoring towards a PEL. Is there a clear reaction plan in place, or further monitoring when the 5,000-ppm threshold is crossed? Maybe once the alarm is activated, hourly monitoring could be conducted. That reaction plan may reduce the likelihood of a 'nuisance alarm' being ignored. Someone else mentioned draeger tubes for testing exposure over longer periods of time. These can be a reference point if you're concerned how the monitors represent working conditions. Do you have only the Low- and High-level alarms? Do you have a High-High option (5,000 = monitor; 15,000 = mitigate; and 30,000 = evacuate)? I'd be reluctant to change the settings if frequently cresting the 5,000 ppm mark.  

    I would note that carbon dioxide is listed as both an asphyxiant and toxic gas by the USDA and NIH



    ------------------------------
    josh waldman
    brewmaster
    elysian brewing co
    seattle, wa
    ------------------------------



  • 18.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 11-03-2023 14:11

    Elevated CO2 concentration used to be the #1 cause of fatal accidents in wine cellars in Germany, before CO2 monitors were available. Cellar masters used a lit candle as a simple detector. Since CO2 is heavier than air it settles at the floor level and that's were you find the highest concentrations. You could capture the CO2 in an alkali trap, but that has other hazards associated with it and venting to the outside might be a safer and more economical. Some German breweries used to recapture the CO2 to later carbonate the beer with it, as the addition of fresh CO2 would have been against the German Reinheitsgebot... 



    ------------------------------
    Volker Bornemann
    President
    Avazyme, Inc.
    Research Triangle Park, NC
    avazyme.com
    ------------------------------



  • 19.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 11-06-2023 00:13
    Josh, you are on track. The whole point of this is that it really is not safe for workers to breathe CO2 at concentrations above 5000 ppm; and it is argued whether 5000 ppm is safe.

    5000 ppm CO2 is both the permissible exposure limit and the action level for CO2 and action needs to take place because you aren't allowed to be exposed to a higher concentration than 5000 ppm. The only other acceptable way to remain in this location of 5000 plus ppm is to be wearing and breathing from self contained breathing apparatus (SCBA).

    For reference. Let's use the model of other industries who constantly deal with hazardous gas and vapor and those used by many gas detector manufacturers in their default alarm settings as guidance. The high alarm is always the PEL and action level. When the high alarm occurs, the work area is cleared of workers. For CO2, this would be 5000 ppm.

    The low alarm is always half of the high alarm. It acts as an indication that something is going wrong and something needs to be corrected and that everyone needs to be ready to evacuate. This is the response plan used by water and wastewater treatment plants, refrigeration facilities, oil and gas, chemical processing (including our brewery chemical suppliers), and others.

    To remain in this atmosphere above the PEL, manufacturers like these have self contained breathing apparatus located in these hazardous locations for workers to quickly don and escape. The only ones who don't use them for escape are those trained to work in SCBA to stop the problem and fix it.

    As additional reference. The two big name breweries within 90 minutes of me use the 2500 alarm point as their evacuation alarm so that their workers are never exposed to concentrations above 5000 ppm CO2. If you would like to see what happens, you can reference the OSHA citations for Houston brewery Anheuser Busch for exposing workers to CO2. 

    Let's ask the question which leads to a logical conclusion. If the action level is 5000 ppm CO2 and an action to evacuate is necessary, then what value is an alarm set above 5000 ppm? You aren't supposed to be where there is more than 5000ppm. Unless you are breathing from a self contained breathing apparatus.

    Sorry if this offends someone. 
    We are arguing about protecting a fellow brewer from the documented health risks of CO2 exposure above 5000 ppm..

    Thanks,
     
            Tony
     
    RUSSELL McCRIMMON, O.H.S.T.
    @brewery.safety.consulting





  • 20.  RE: CO2 monitor alarm levels - Safety

    Posted 11-06-2023 00:15
    Jason, thanks for including that unfortunate and incorrect MBAA  warning sign. That needs to be eliminated for the misguidance that it is. If Emma is monitoring this she can make the Safety Committee make the immediate correction. What URL did you find that at?

    Roger, the Modelo confined space tragedy wasn't caused by being overcome by CO2, The three were overcome when chemicals were introduced into the confined space and the toxic environment was created. The would be rescuers were the additional 4 victims. Never rush in to be a rescuer.

    Karl, I am happy to learn the name of the person who survived the CO2 exposure and drove the corrections at AB. I had the pleasure of helping provide quality personal detection equipment for entry into the fermenters to remove the beech wood strips, and all the other CO2 related tasks. I I wasn't told your name but only the story, I only knew how I was helping the anonymous person and the teams work safely. 

    Most importantly to "anonymous".

    Gas detector tubes like Draeger tubes do not work by hanging them on a worker. Gas detector tubes are used in a device which is essentially a reverse hypodermic needle and the plunger is pulled outward to suck a measured air sample into the tube. It is sucking the measured volume of air into the tube which gives a concentration of the CO2 (or other gas/ vapor) that is in the air of the area where the sample is taken.
    I hope I am misunderstanding your explanation of how to use them.
    But if I understand you correctly? Whoever taught you and your team to use a detector tube as you describe put all of you at the risk of death or high exposure illness. That is inexcusable on their part. Please correct how you use them and keep your team safe.

    Thanks,
     
            Tony
     
    RUSSELL McCRIMMON, O.H.S.T.
    @brewery.safety.consulting