Ask The Brewmasters

 View Only
  • 1.  Can Seamer - CCP or no CCP ?

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 04-02-2024 12:41
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Good morning all, a quick question regarding can seaming. 

    We operate a one-sealing head sealer with daily QC checks for all of the associated parameters with seaming.

    Also, there is an inline FT detector checking for low-pressure high pressure and filling level. Operating with the Codex Decision tree and these control measures - would a one-seamer unit be a CCP (critical control point) on your packaging line? 



  • 2.  RE: Can Seamer - CCP or no CCP ?

    Posted 04-03-2024 12:44

    If you are talking HAACP rules.  Yes, anything that could lead to a food safety or quality issue is a CCP.



    ------------------------------
    Ivan Dedek
    Brewmaster/Food Scientist
    Meier's Creek Brewing
    Cazenovia NY
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Can Seamer - CCP or no CCP ?

    Posted 04-03-2024 14:22

    From the NCBI : At the broadest level, the HACCP system is a preventive-based method for assuring food product safety. Biological, physical, and chemical hazards can be prevented, reduced, or eliminated through this system. (NCBI article.)

    From a HACCP perspective the question always comes down to food safety.  You would have to determine through hazard analysis if the seamer fits under a food safety risk.  Looking at the Codex Decision tree, it states "Is control at this step necessary for safety?".  This is where you need to focus.

    From a beer quality perspective, the seamer is absolutely a critical point.  Beer rarely gets better in the can.  



    ------------------------------
    Elliott Parcells
    Odell Brewing Co
    Loveland CO
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Can Seamer - CCP or no CCP ?

    Posted 04-03-2024 16:37

    I'm don't fully understand your set up but, yes, I feel the seamer is a critical control point.  If it is out of spec every can will be out of spec. To me the seamer and transfer chain are mission critical.  



    ------------------------------
    John Baise
    Packaging Manager
    Odell Brewing Co

    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Can Seamer - CCP or no CCP ?

    Posted 04-04-2024 02:22

    At least from my experience in the UK, GMP auditors would not likely require the seamer to be a CCP. I suggest you run risk rating/hazard analysis on each step in your process (impact rating x likelihood) and only enter into your CCP decision tree if the hazard is significant enough. There isn't any set rule about how to define your risk rating or CCP decision tree, but for example ours looks like this:

    Impact ratings: 1 = Low (hazard might cause disgust but no significant adverse physical health effect), 3 = Moderate (might cause mild adverse physical health effect with consistent exposure), 5 = Severe (consumption might cause severe physical problems).

    Likelihood ratings1 = Very Low (it can occur less than once a year), 1.5 = Low (can occur once per month per year), 3 = Moderate (can occur once per week to once per month), 5 = Severe (can occur every batch to once per week).


    Score
    ≤ 3 Define preventatives measures, but do not enter decision tree: no CCP or PRP+. Normal preventative measures will cover hazards.

    Score >3 Define preventative measures to prevent, eliminate or reduce hazard to an acceptable level AND enter decision tree.

    It's not perfect and it can be awkward to fit every hazard into this rating, but definitely still a useful tool. I would think that the impact rating from improperly sealed cans would be quite low (bad for quality and reputation but little harm to customer).



    ------------------------------
    Francesco Mayell
    Co-Head Brewer
    Brixton Brewery
    London
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Can Seamer - CCP or no CCP ?

    Posted 04-04-2024 13:12

    Hi,

    I would not classify this as a CCP as the seaming process is not eliminating/reducing a consumer safety hazard. It is an absolutely necessary step in terms of product quality, but I do not see how that relates to consumer safety. 

    What safety hazard do you believe to exist at the closure step? 



    ------------------------------
    Alexander Nham
    QA Manager
    Goose Island Beer Co.
    Chicago IL
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: Can Seamer - CCP or no CCP ?

    Posted 04-04-2024 14:46

    There has already been some great feedback to your question posted by others.   So, I won't repeat that, in particular you must use a likelihood vs severity matrix to rate the hazards or the truly critical few CPs (trees) will be lost my in the "forest".

    You must remember that HACCP is about food safety and consumers health and well-being protection.   It is not about what is important to great quality.  Keep the two "programs/systems" separate.

    In your seamer example:

          Poor closure set-up = leaking seams = flat product in market = displeased consumer...a critical quality parameter.

          Poor closure set-up = sharp seam at the end opening point = cut/injured consumer.....a CCP in your HACCP program.

    Happy to "chat" over email if you would like I'm in the directory.   Hope this helps.



    ------------------------------
    Walter Heeb
    Retired
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: Can Seamer - CCP or no CCP ?

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 04-19-2024 09:47
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    There is an FT Inspector just after the Seamer which would reject cans that don't hold pressure. In addition, twice hourly checks are reviewed / opened and tasted before release (within 24 hours). Not to mention seaming checks during Run 1. In my book this lowers the probability in the risk matrix. Thank you all for your contributions, much appreciated 




  • 9.  RE: Can Seamer - CCP or no CCP ?

    Posted 04-19-2024 17:14

    Not a CCP.  CCP are for food safety hazards meaning that there is no future step to mitigate risk of harm to consumer.  Seamer would be considered a quality control point.  It doesn't mean it's not an important or critical step in your operation, but in the world of HACCP it wouldn't be considered a CCP.



    ------------------------------
    Jason Weihbrecht
    GM of Brewery Operations
    Oskar Blues Brewery
    Brevard NC
    ------------------------------